The climate house of cards is collapsing, as became clear last week at the IPCC meeting in Ethiopia. The climate narrative has never had any substance, and now that the flow of funding is being cut off, there will soon be nothing left, says Wim Röst, Chair of the Clintel Board.
Guest Post by Drs. Wim Röst
What exactly did we just see happening in Ethiopia? The IPCC, the UN Climate Panel (a self-appointed organisation), met there with representatives from 195 countries to prepare for what was supposed to be a major UN climate summit in 2028. In principle, a new IPCC assessment report (the seventh) was to be produced prior to that summit, but there was no funding and no agreement, not even on the report’s publication date.
Google AI Mode described the conclusion of the summit in Addis Ababa, the capital of Ethiopia, as follows:
“An unprecedentedly fierce political battle raged throughout the week over the timeline for the seventh major climate report (AR7).
Proponents of urgency (including European countries and island states): Want the report to be fully completed by 2028 at the latest. This is crucial to serve as the scientific basis for the important UN climate summit (Global Stocktake) in that same year.
Opponents (including Saudi Arabia, China, India and Russia): Called for a delay until 2029. Officially, they argue that poorer countries need more time to contribute, but behind the scenes it is believed that this is an attempt to reduce the political pressure on the fossil fuel industry.
As IPCC decisions must be taken by full consensus, the outstanding issues regarding the timeline and the budget could not be resolved. The meeting will resume at a yet-to-be-determined date, as soon as possible, to continue the discussion.”
As long as there is money left, there will undoubtedly be a follow-up, and 195 delegations will once again fly to a central location to solve ‘the enormous climate problem’ that is ‘entirely caused by fossil fuels’.
This year’s Gulf crisis demonstrated that we cannot do without fossil fuels. Iran’s blocking of shipping lanes brought the supply of oil and gas to a standstill for a time and when combined with the war in Ukraine, the result was a massive increase in price and fuel shortages. Countries such as India, Pakistan and Bangladesh had to use their scarce energy supplies for purposes other than fertiliser production. Urea plants use natural gas as a raw material to produce the nitrogen-based fertiliser that is indispensable to their agriculture. Without this fertiliser, their agricultural production collapses, with immediate consequences for food prices and food security for tens, if not hundreds, of millions of people.
Numerous other factories that rely on fossil fuels to produce essential goods also ran into difficulties, and the least of the consequences were massive price rises. In such a situation, the poorest countries and the poorest populations are left behind, and this quickly amounts to a few billion people.
The Gulf War brought to light the utter impossibility of ‘Net Zero’. This is the deeper context of the current conflict within the IPCC. What was being pursued is completely impossible, quite apart from the widespread doubts about its necessity. No one can ignore it any longer: actually, stopping the production of all fossil fuels means nothing other than a ‘Zero Economy’.
And that is why the climate house of cards is now collapsing.
This article has been written in a personal capacity. It was first published on Clintel.nl. Dutch publications that served as a primary source can be found here and here.
The featured image was created with AI.
